Search results

YAYYYYY

Fuck Ed and the cousin he rode in on. lol :) *WAVES** Hi Ed..........

depends on what you call skill? In hardcore you can turn a corner meet 3-4 enemy infantry in your face, and come out the winner dropping all 4. If your skilled. That don't happen much in normal mode. I will grant you that in normal mode it takes more "skill" if you will, to out shoot someone...

you mom gay

Wishing You Well. Hope your roads are paved with Gold. Keep your head in the right direction and keep happy thoughts, no matter what. Attitude is so much more important than we think. God Speed my friend.

Another idea i'd like to try.... is with the current BF4 player base, is 64 players on a 32 player map size. :)

for the 100th time, balance on conquest servers should be based on flag cap points that a person has. Lets say 10 players have great (high) amount of flag cap points.... those 10 would be distributed between the 2 teams. It is very, very obvious on lopsided teams, that the poor team, if you...

I don't think strategy is even a word worth mentioning when talking about bf4, at least within the conquest realm. It used to be every game was pretty good (even). Then it was, man, lots of uneven play, now it is reversed, only a good balance game maybe, 1 out 14 or so?

me tarzan you womans, in my city.

Krowdstrike

Since its conquest mode, I don't understand why anyone would be in the uncap either shooting out, or shooting in. The whole concept is primarily flags. But as most here know, for some reason, conquest mode as a whole and by the majority, isn't played much anymore by gamers. Actually by people...

Back in the day, when I was admin of NODA servers, there was no shooting from or into, uncap. And people who treaded the needle were booted as well. Lets face it, people shoot from and retreat to, uncaps for another layer of protection. However to admin this, we did have 2 to 3 active admins...

he was calm....and wasn't asking for or demanding a ban. thats calm my friend.

I remember a few years back @noda server. If someone repeatedly went 100/2 or better, every, single, map over and over.....say in a helo, they were asked/told to use something else. Unless of course they were found to be cheating. However, if not proven, sometimes its just better that the 1...

I miss the old days when Admins took "shifts" if you will, to play/monitor gameplay, and could kick/ban/suspend players instantly while gaming.

aside from the obvious tardy hackers, most guys that eventually get caught hacking usually had boot lickers saying, "no, he is just good" or, "he would never cheat". Been playing this game for 20 years, and its always the same old story. If its too good to be true, you can bet your ass, it is...

Somebody call Ripleys believe it or not...i read all this shit, and now way fucken dumber.

It is a valid point. Absolute users of cheats wouldn't ever be able to pay to get back in. But if you did some idiot things, it may work in that case. But the idea is bad in its entirety. The end result is or could be, bans would be handed out more steadily to procure, "fines" for more $$. Thats...

I'd rather there be a charge and cap on ammo in the game :)

run and gun, but I like to go after tanks/lav etc. I don't have a style going after tanks, but its usually run and gun at tanks too. Which is kinda like a strat, because I dont think alot of tankers expect it.