All Bz servers seem to be malfunctioning

Im starting to feel like its me but it was happening off and on last week on bz1 meantioned in a previous thread. but yesterday server shut down when I switched to a commader role and it did restart over and over while people kept populating the server. I tried joing bz1, 1.5 and 6 just down and same shit. I havent been able to join a populated server without restart of the entire server. Ive had 3 attempts today and +5 last night no luck joing populated server without restart.
 
There are not "many" servers around, but it seems to be effecting US servers and not Euro ones. I was playing earlier on one where i had 140 ping and server didnt shut down at all. ( normally have about 28 ping. What is wacked is, my 140 ping I can feel heavily effect play, while 200 pingers come on bz and it seemingly has zero effect. They must have better internet than the states? All I can gather.
 
It's not a DDoS attack at all. You wouldn't be able to connect to the servers at all if that was the case. I can sit in spectator for 15+ minutes and not have any issues. Admin panel is still accessible with no connection issues whatsoever. It's simply a bug that is resulting in all active players being removed from the server every minute or so and the round constantly being restarted every minute.

It's an even greater issue with the server and EA's services. Sadly we don't have any updates from EA or the server provider about when this will be resolved. We're also not the only servers faced with this issue.
 
not gonna lie, I almost bought the new battlefield so can i can play. then as I was about to purchase it, i backed out. there are a few servers up and running without the bug, so there is something to it, as far the problem. Is it just conquest servers? Is it certain servers running a certain software or hardware.....? Be cool to find out.
 
not gonna lie, I almost bought the new battlefield so can i can play. then as I was about to purchase it, i backed out. there are a few servers up and running without the bug, so there is something to it, as far the problem. Is it just conquest servers? Is it certain servers running a certain software or hardware.....? Be cool to find out.
Just play oh GMH, we like you howie.
 
There are not "many" servers around, but it seems to be effecting US servers and not Euro ones. I was playing earlier on one where i had 140 ping and server didnt shut down at all. ( normally have about 28 ping. What is wacked is, my 140 ping I can feel heavily effect play, while 200 pingers come on bz and it seemingly has zero effect. They must have better internet than the states? All I can gather.
it,s defo affecting euro servers .same problem here in the uk and many other european countries . constant you have lost connection issue,s .cant get on anything today ,banzore servers ,extreme hardcore servers you name it ,it,s all buggered .
 
There are not "many" servers around, but it seems to be effecting US servers and not Euro ones. I was playing earlier on one where i had 140 ping and server didnt shut down at all. ( normally have about 28 ping. What is wacked is, my 140 ping I can feel heavily effect play, while 200 pingers come on bz and it seemingly has zero effect. They must have better internet than the states? All I can gather.
They're just used to running around in mud and having to compensate their aim for their shitty Brazilian internet.
 
Im starting to feel like its me but it was happening off and on last week on bz1 meantioned in a previous thread. but yesterday server shut down when I switched to a commader role and it did restart over and over while people kept populating the server. I tried joing bz1, 1.5 and 6 just down and same shit. I havent been able to join a populated server without restart of the entire server. Ive had 3 attempts today and +5 last night no luck joing populated server without restart.
Most likely EA is doing this on purpose... To discourage people away frrom BF4 and preparing people psychologically , mentally and emotionally for the new Battlfield about to be released
 
Most likely EA is doing this on purpose... To discourage people away frrom BF4 and preparing people psychologically , mentally and emotionally for the new Battlfield about to be released

My theory - the game they're going to release is basically just BF4 and they're betting that because they released the WW1 game, then the WW2 game, then the future game... the bulk of their players will forget and buy the same game again. And everyone will be like "OMG, they FIXED BF! It's good again!" And all of us will be like "this is basically just BF4."
 
not gonna lie, I almost bought the new battlefield so can i can play. then as I was about to purchase it, i backed out. there are a few servers up and running without the bug, so there is something to it, as far the problem. Is it just conquest servers? Is it certain servers running a certain software or hardware.....? Be cool to find out.
I installed 2042 because it's free with Xbox Game Pass. It's okay. But merely that, just okay. Esp compared to BF4.
 
I still stand by my theory that the next BF basically going to be BF4.
The teaser they released already basically confirmed that. M4gery with an EOTech. Tan Abrams. Generic Middle Eastern buildings. It's Battlefield 2/3/4 Redux. In and of itself this doesn't bother me since it is a cool setting and scenario with iconic weapons and tactics. I'd love to see a kind of BF2 story continuation with the MEC, and maybe the EU, and possibly China or even India ( if we want to throw realism out the window ) but there is almost zero chance of that happening for multiple reasons. If it's a good game that doesn't deviate from the Battlefield mold ( no Battle Royal bullshit , no "seasons" , no emotes or dances, at least some attempt at realism or "authenticity" , minimal microtransactions ) then I will be happy to pay for it and play it.

I expect, and am prepared for, it to be terrible however. Big game publishers in general and EA in particular do not have a good track record over the past 10-15 years.
 
The teaser they released already basically confirmed that. M4gery with an EOTech. Tan Abrams. Generic Middle Eastern buildings. It's Battlefield 2/3/4 Redux. In and of itself this doesn't bother me since it is a cool setting and scenario with iconic weapons and tactics. I'd love to see a kind of BF2 story continuation with the MEC, and maybe the EU, and possibly China or even India ( if we want to throw realism out the window ) but there is almost zero chance of that happening for multiple reasons. If it's a good game that doesn't deviate from the Battlefield mold ( no Battle Royal bullshit , no "seasons" , no emotes or dances, at least some attempt at realism or "authenticity" , minimal microtransactions ) then I will be happy to pay for it and play it.

I expect, and am prepared for, it to be terrible however. Big game publishers in general and EA in particular do not have a good track record over the past 10-15 years.
It will be terrible.
 
Most likely EA is doing this on purpose... To discourage people away frrom BF4 and preparing people psychologically , mentally and emotionally for the new Battlfield about to be released

Battlefield Six will very likely be called "Battlefield Sucks".

Mark my words.

That said, I deeply hope I will be wrong. Sadly, I don't expect to be.
 
Back
Top