Search results

Swag is a fucking goof in the true Canadian definition of the word. Told ya'll I was in his head and under his skin. Panda, you will be missed.

I'm in your head and under your skin dude. Enjoy it.

Poor Swag, all laughing and bothered. What a miserable existence.

Rules are a set of logic. Logic starts with the Law of Identity. It is not absurd to request identification when rules are concerned. That is what Bunny is saying. Guys, for fuck's sake, study some higher level maths.

You're actually retarded dude. I hope you see now see why we need definitions in terms of "attack" and "uncap". (You won't see, you're an idiot). Your bitch ass thinks driving a vehicle is attacking. Others understand attacking to be firing weapons or equipment. The guy with the most "I'm...

Thank you, sincerely, for answering my question. And there you are to those who followed along and wished to know. Sorry Bunny that you couldn't get closure. Take care gentlemen.

A friendly recap, in case things arent clear (because clarity is valuable): - no one is arguing about the placement of rules. generally, players like rules. players - including donators who are afraid to ask - are and have been for some time requesting clarity in language and enforcement...

This is understood. Are players that are not banned yet allowed to throw C4 onto a tank that is clear of uncap boundary? Let the people know who the real Swag is.

Good ol' Swag. So happy to be in last place. An oldie but a goodie:

This was the fundamental lesson where Swag got his MBA. Other alumni of this prestigious school include Bernie Madoff, the CFO of Silicon Valley Bank, and the entire board of Enron.

Wait I think asking questions is bannable. It's common sense. The one thing I know is not bannable: Having a fragile ego. It will get you promoted to BZ's most pathetic admin.

It follows then that throwing them onto a tank that is clear of uncap is fair play then, right? Hello, retard faggot? You there?

Friendly reminder that you can say "retard" in the server but you cant be one, it'll earn you (is earn the right word here?) a ban. Explanations and bannable details are on all Fibonacci and Prime Number pages of Rulez threads one thru five, period 2015 through 2024 excluding years where...

Threatening bans for wanting to make this place better and suggesting ways is such a sloping forehead move Swag.

Ban me too faggot.

I made a suggestion for a solution to this problem and I was mocked, so suggestions and solutions are off the menu. That leaves: Witch Craft Mind Reading Just Do Whatever Bro Lol Give Us Money So We Can Laugh At You Get Rekt Mind Reading Part 2: The Sequel

I was laughed at by Swag for even mentioning uncap maps to reduce confusions. Laughed at. By an admin. Now, here, Mr. Panda is submitting uncap maps, to reduce confusion. This is great. I love it. Carry on, Bunnz.

Bunny is making a point, and a valid one at that, and it's clear that Bunny has been at the mercy of undefined rules and interpretations in real life. So have I. This will change the way you view stuff like this. Bunny doesn't want 500 pages of rules, he said that already. He - and we - are...

Hmm, follow along with me. PLACING mines or C4 at uncap entrance is attacking uncap. This locks armor in the uncap. Infantry waiting outside uncap to attack infantry or armor as soon as they are clear of uncap is deemed legitimate. Often in reports/appeals, decision comes down to being clear...