Not at all, as I informed your 2 Admins who disrespected me when I was respectful, I run various internet sites and Forums as well (that's how I know about XenForo's silent edits feature) and have been doing so for over 15 years. I'm intimate with my sister and familiar with the laws surrounding forum communities, web hosting, and Section 230. When a site is violating copyright, the copyright holder files a DMCA with that site's host. The host then gives the site owner a relatively short period of time (usually 48 hours) to remove the copyright violations from their site or they take action against the site. This is simplified, of course, but that is the gist of it. I know as I've dealt with many DMCA take down requests for copyright violations done by my users. I always took action immediately and never had any problems.I think there's a big lack of understanding about how DMCA works here.
Then you have Section 230 which actually protects sites from liability for such copyright violations done unbeknownst to them by their users. That liability protection goes out the window, however, when the site is made aware of such copyright violations and takes no action. This becomes very clear cut when an actual Admin of the site uploads stolen content, and doubly so after being informed of it, which is what makes RogaineFoam's actions in this thread so damaging as it makes him and the site lose their only legal defense beyond any shadow of a doubt.